The right methodology
leads to predictable clinical
success, time after time
by Dr. Chad C. Duplantis
Indirect restorative dentistry presents clinicians with many options in regard to technique, materials
and acquisition of a final impression. As dentistry has evolved, digital technology has proven to be a
worthy competitor to analog methods; however, the need for traditional impression materials will exist
for the foreseeable future.
Regardless of the method of acquisition, the principles of impressioning remain the same. Adherence
to these principles, an understanding of the materials and technology, and a sound preparation design
will help dentists achieve clinical success of the final restoration. This article addresses various aspects
that provide predictable results regardless of mode of acquisition.
Preparation design
After the appropriate diagnosis and treatment planning for an indirect restoration, it’s imperative that
all restorations start with an appropriately planned preparation design. Ultimately, several factors—caries,
previous restorations, etc.—will dictate the final design but it is still important to try to adhere to some
fundamental criteria. In a desired design for a full-coverage restoration, an appropriate preparation with
attention to marginal detail is crucial for restorative success
Characteristics of an appropriate preparation design include:
- Ideal taper (5–6 degrees).
- Axial wall height (3–4 mm).
- Appropriate use of retentive
features (such as boxes and
grooves) when needed.
- Avoidance of undercuts.
- Smooth, finished with a finer
diamond.
- Established path of insertion.
In addition to these characteristics,
it is imperative to follow the preparation
guidelines for the proposed
material of the restoration—especially
reduction. Attention to these
parameters will increase success in the
impression, cementation and overall
longevity of the restoration (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1: “Ideal” characteristics of a retentive preparation.
Analog impression materials
and technique
Analog impression materials have evolved
over the past several decades to include some
impressive materials. As a profession, we have
seen some great successes with reversable
hydrocolloid, polyether and polyvinylsiloxane
(PVS) impression materials. Although all
will work, some of the newer PVS materials
have favorable characteristics that will
provide a nice result.
It’s important to understand the various
viscosities of impression materials. Elastomeric
impression materials are available in
multiple viscosities: low (syringe or wash
material), medium or monophasic, high (tray
or heavy body) and very high (putty). The
viscosity is determined by the filler content
in the impression material. As filler content
increases, so does viscosity, which lowers
the shearing forces.1
Other characteristics that play a role in
the accuracy of an impression material are
the hydrophilicity of the dental impression
material (related to the contact angle) and the
elastic recovery (which is directly related to
the dimensional stability). Any material with
a low contact angle will capture better detail.
Although the material can still be affected
by blood and saliva, artificial surfactants
have been incorporated into the material
to offset the potential distortion.2–4
It’s also important to understand the
products’ working and set time. These
will vary among brands and even within
brands. Most brands will have a “quicker”
set version for the viscosities, in which the
lower viscosity will flow better and is used
to capture the detail of preparations while
the higher viscosity is used to fill the tray
and capture the surrounding structures.
These newer PVS materials have provided
clinically acceptable impressions.
V-Posil VPS impression material (Voco),
for example, offers many of the characteristics
that clinicians should look for in the
VPS category It’s available in a range of
viscosities—light, heavy and mono—and
flows very well among them. It has a unique
time-optimized working and set time.
Although it is labeled “fast,” the working
time of two minutes is ample for single or
multiple units. The set time is only two
minutes as well. These characteristics
make this material attractive to the dentist
for efficiency and the patient for comfort.
For a great analog impression, a suggested
technique is to use a light-body
material and place the tip into the sulcus,
extruding gently in a circumferential manner
to capture the margins. Do not remove
the tip until you have covered the entire
margin. Then, use a light stream of air to
continue to introduce the material into
the sulcus. You may then cover the entire
prep(s) with light-body and use air to thin
the material once more.
While the clinician is introducing the
light-body material to the preparation, the
assistant should be filling the tray with
medium- or heavy-body impression material.
The tray is then gently seated. The final
impression should capture marginal detail
with no bubbles or voids on the margin or
crucial areas of the preparation (Fig. 2).
All of this is done in a timely manner and
with respect to the working and set times
of the impression material.
Fig. 2: A clinically acceptable impression taken with V-Posil VPS Heavy Fast (blue) and V-Posil Light Fast (orange) impression materials, with
all crucial areas and margins captured. Small bubbles are noticed at the gingival margin of Tooth #3 but not on the preparation margin.
Digital impressions
and techniques
Digital impressions have become a
common alternative over the past several
years for restorative dentistry. In a 2021
survey, 43% of respondents reported using
digital impression systems—up from 37%
in 2020 and 36% in 2019. Among DSO
respondents, 57% report using intraoral
scanners.5 This represents a huge market shift
over the past several years. With increased
users, we must understand how these systems
work and become comfortable using them.
Intraoral scanners offer several advantages,
including comfort for patients, time
efficiency and simplified procedures for
dentists, reduction in the need for stone
models and better communication among
the dentist, patient and laboratory.6
These scanners are incredibly accurate,
which makes them a suitable alternative
for traditional impressions for multiple
prosthetic restorations. Inlays, onlays,
crowns, fixed partial dentures and single
to multiple units are all great capabilities
of the current scanners on the market.
(There is somewhat of a debate on the
capabilities in terms of longer span and
full-arch restorations and appliances.6,7)
A common misperception of intraoral
scanners is that they will alleviate some of the
problems associated with traditional analog
impressioning methods. The technique
plays an important role, but adherence to
a few principles will be critical to achieve
a satisfactory impression regardless of the
method. In other words, both methods
allow the practitioner to achieve a highly
successful impression.
The principles
Before taking a final impression for
indirect restorative cases, each situation
must be analyzed and treated as unique. I’ve
already discussed appropriate preparation
design, but it’s important to evaluate tooth
condition after preparation but before
impressions. Some factors that may inhibit
a successful impression are excessive tissue,
blood and saliva.
To take a great final impression, a
few principles must be adhered to, and
remain constant regardless of technique,
for predictable success. Once again, these
principles remain constant regardless of
technique:
- Visualization.
- Retraction.
- Moisture control.
Visualization
To take an impression, the entire
preparation must be visible and free of
contamination. This includes the occlusal
surface, margins and axial walls. The
preparation should be free of undercuts and
rough edges, as previously outlined for ideal
preparations. A great way to visualize this is
to use an occlusal mirror or hover over the
prep with the wand of an intraoral scanner
before impressioning. The entire prep must be
visible, or it will not be captured, regardless
of method of impressioning
Retraction
After preparation, tissue can collapse or
cover the margin, decreasing visibility and
hindering the ability to fully capture the
margin. The necessity for retraction persists
even with the most ideal of preparations.
In practice, we have several items at
our disposal that can assist with retraction.
In some instances, multiple items may be
needed to accomplish appropriate retraction.
Below is a list of several items commonly
used to retract the tissue:
- Retraction cord, mostly Sizes 1 and 2
(multiple manufacturers).
- A diode laser (BlueWave, Clinicians
Choice; AMD Picasso, AMD Lasers).
- Retraction paste (Voco Retraction
Paste, Voco; 3M Retraction Paste, 3M Oral Care; Expasyl, Acteon;
Traxodent, Premier Dental).
- Compression Cap (Roeko
Comprecap, Coltene
A commonly used approach in my
clinical practice is a combination of a No. 1
retraction cord and retraction paste. If the
preparation is more subgingival, the use of a
diode laser may be indicated to “trough” the
tissue around the margin of the preparation.
Voco’s retraction paste is unique in
this category because it has a two-phase
consistency for a simpler application: The
paste first flows easily under lower pressure,
then increases its viscosity over time to
remain stable and hold the sulcus.
The material is contained in a compule
with an elongated and flexible tip (Fig. 3),
which affords the capability of direct,
controlled introduction into the sulcus. The
material controls sulcular bleeding, displaces
any remaining sulcular moisture, and leads
to a widened sulcus for visualization and
accurate impressioning. After application,
the material is rinsed off with ease after
one or two minutes. Its active ingredient is
aluminum chloride, which unlike ferrous
sulfite astringent materials leaves no precipitate
that can interfere with bonding or
cause discoloration over time.
Fig. 3: Voco retraction paste compule packaging and illustration of introduction of the material into
the sulcus.
Moisture control
Once we have achieved visualization
and retraction, moisture must be controlled.
It is essential to consider the crevicular
fluids and excessive moisture on the tooth.
Whether the material is clear (saliva, water,
etc.) or colored (blood and other materials
used during the procedure), the presence
of excessive fluid will adversely affect the
quality of the restoration. This holds true for
both digital and analog techniques. Gentle
air pressure will not only help maintain a
dry field but also assist in the introduction
of higher-viscosity impression material into
the sulcus in an analog technique. For digital
impressions, air is necessary, but cotton rolls
and Dri-Angles can help isolate the area and
control moisture in the surrounding tissues.
Several other hemostatic agents can
help control bleeding before impressions
are taken. In my practice we use:
- Aluminum chloride- and ferric
sulfate-based hemostatic agents.
- A diode laser.
- Retraction pastes.
These products all have their place in
the operatory in situations that require
moisture control.
Case 1: Retraction paste,
Comprecap
In this case, Tooth #3 was prepared for
a full-coverage zirconia restoration.
After preparation, some sulcular bleeding
was noted. The margin was in close proximity
to the gingival margin, and the patient was
in good periodontal health. It was decided to
treat this case without packing a cord, using
only retraction paste. Voco retraction paste
was placed into the sulcus circumferentially,
a medium-sized Comprecap was introduced
and the patient was instructed to place
pressure on the Comprecap by biting. After
two minutes, the Comprecap was removed
and the paste rinsed off. In Fig. 4, the paste
has been displaced; this is not a characteristic
of the paste but because of the placement
of the Comprecap. The entire margin was
visible and sulcular bleeding ceased, which
led to a successful final impression (Fig. 5).
Fig. 4: Upper left: Sulcular bleeding present at Tooth #3 after preparation. Lower left: Applying Voco
Retraction Paste and Roeko Comprecap to compress gingival tissue. Upper right: Retraction paste
after removal of Comprecap. Lower right: After two minutes, retraction paste is removed, margins are
visible and bleeding has ceased.
Fig. 5: Final digital impression of #3 with all
visible margins. Tooth #4 is an implant scan
body.
Case 2: Single soaked cord,
retraction paste
In this case, there was a supracrestal palatal
fracture and the tooth had been recently
treated endodontically. The palatal margin
was approximately 0.75 mm subgingival.
After preparation, sulcular bleeding was
evident. A #1 cord soaked in Tissue Goo
hemostatic gel (Clinician’s Choice) was
placed into the sulcus and did not completely
control the bleeding. Voco retraction paste was introduced into the sulcus above the
cord and sat for two minutes. After rinsing
the paste, sulcular bleeding had ceased
and we were ready for the final impression
(Figs. 6 and 7).
Fig. 6: Left, top to bottom: Sulcular bleeding present after preparing Tooth #4; bleeding still present after
placing a #1 cord; after placing Voco Retraction Paste. Right: After retraction paste has been rinsed off,
the tooth is ready for impression.
Fig. 7: The final digital impression for #4.
In both cases, one will note that Voco
retraction paste was a common theme for
both retraction and moisture control. The
capabilities of this paste are unique and
great success has been achieved with this as
both the primary agent and as an additional
agent. Retraction pastes are a great addition
to any clinical armamentarium and should
greatly improve the dental team’s retraction
and moisture control abilities.
Conclusion
Indirect restorative impressioning can
be accomplished by many viable methods
and a satisfactory result can be achieved.
Additionally, an analog or digital technique
can be adopted and used with great
success for indirect dentistry. Every tooth
is different, every mouth is different and
each clinical situation is different. Close
examination of each clinical situation is
imperative for success. There is no “one size
fits all” for impressioning techniques. We
have a vast array of materials available for
use, each with different indications. Attention
to the principles and an understanding
of techniques can help any clinical practice
take great impressions every time.
Reference
1. Burgess J. “Impression Material Basics.” Inside Dentistry,
Oct 2005. 1(1).
2. Basapogu S, Pilla A and Pathipaka S. “Dimensional Accuracy
of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic VPS Impression Materials
Using Different Impression Techniques—An Invitro
Study.” J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(2): ZC56–ZC59.
3. Donovan, TE et. al. 13–Dental Biomaterials, Editor(s)
Ritter AV, Boushell LW, Walter R. “Sturdevant’s Art and
Science of Operative Dentistry,” Elsevier, 2019, Pages
453–510.
4. Punj A, Bompolaki D and Garaicoa J. “Dental Impression
Materials and Techniques. Dental Clinics of North America.”
(2017) 61. 779–796.
5. Mazda J. “Trends in Dentistry 2021, Making Sense of
Unusual Times.” Inside Dentistry, Dec 2021 17 (12), Pages
12–16.
6. Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G and Logozzo S.
“Intraoral Scanners in Dentistry: A Review of the Current
Literature.” BMC Oral Health (2017). 17(1), 149.
7. Cicciù M, Fiorillo L, D’Amico C, Gambino D, Amantia
EM, Laino L, Crimi S, Campagna P, Bianchi A, Herford
AS and Cervino G. (2020). “3D Digital Impression Systems
Compared with Traditional Techniques in Dentistry: A
Recent Data Systematic Review.” Materials (Basel, Switzerland),
13(8), 1982
Dr. Chad C. Duplantisreceived his DDS from the University
of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio School of
Dentistry, then continued his postdoctoral training at
Baylor College of Dentistry and earned a certificate in
advanced education in general dentistry.
Duplantis has been in private practice since 2000 in
the north Fort Worth, Texas, area with an emphasis on
restorative and aesthetic dentistry. He is a member of Catapult Education’s
speakers bureau and has also been a member of several aesthetic and
restorative continuums, most recently the Spear Education Study Club. He is a
fellow in the Academy of General Dentistry and a clinical consultant for Glidewell
Laboratories. Duplantis lives with his wife and his children in Keller, Texas, where
he enjoys cycling, shooting sporting clays, fishing, traveling and being outdoors